What is Science behind the definition of things that we can observe, reproduce, and test, aka. falsify.
To put it simply, Science is the collected and tested observations of humanity. But what most people don't think to ask is... "Can we observe all of reality?"
because all science is based on human observation.
I will show you that human observation is handicapped, and more correctly it is broken and degenerating.
Materialism is the belief that if something can not be observed, and tested by the scientific method it does not exist, is not real, or at the least is not scientific.
Materialism is the foundational view for atheism.
Lets's get into some science.
Can you observe ultraviolet light, infrared light, x-rays, microscopic worlds, deep space? I could go on...
you will say, "No, but we have built machines to broaden or extend our observational abilities or horizons."
What of the materialist scientist of 200 years ago? They could not observe these things, so by the definitions of materialism, they were not real. We could not observe them.
How many more things will we discover that are "not real" in the future. Materialistic science is actually a progress stopper. It is anti- science. What if all the scientists of hundreds of years ago said. "Well this has never been observed, I can't be real. You should just stick to real science."
The Supernatural world view is actually a science generator. It calls for more exploration, imagination, and never arrogantly saying that we know it all.
Big Bang cosmologists claim there is dark matter, and dark energy, for their model to be viable. but those things have never been observed. So your telling me that these "scientists" believe in lots and lots of stuff they have never observed and can not scientifically verify?
How is this different than claiming a supernatural being caused life to be. Life comes from life. This is the Law of Biogenesis. The Supernatural Creation model actually follows scientific law.
Does the Atheistic, materialistic theory of abiogenis follow natural and scientific laws. Hum?
No. They claim life comes from non-life by chance un-directed processes. This has never been observed or tested and is therefore a claim that supersedes the natural, and is by definition a supernatural process.
The origin of the universe from nothing
Information, design and complexity aka. codes or programs arise from nothing
These are all supernatural claims and do not conform to any scientific observations, laws or principles.
Have a nice day. Try to think some.